Nabors v. State
This text of 106 S.W.2d 285 (Nabors v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Conviction for theft; punishment, three years in the penitentiary.
Appellant was charged with the theft of an automobile. The facts sufficiently support the allegation. Appellant offered no testimony. We find in the record two bills of exceptions. The first complains of the denial of an application for continuance. The bill of exceptions making this complaint is qualified by the trial judge, and the contents of the bill, taken with the qualification, make plain that the refusal of the continuance was not error. The other bill of exceptions complains of the refusal of a peremptory instruction to acquit. We think the action of the lower court in this regard was not erroneous.
No error appearing, the judgment will be affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
106 S.W.2d 285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/nabors-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.