Nabers v. Morris Mining Co.
103 Ala. 543
Opinion
We are compelled to dismiss this appeal, ex mero motu, upon the authority of Clark v. Spencer, 80 Ala. 345; Barclay v. Spragins, Ib. 357, and Jones v. Woodstock Iron Co., 90 Ala. 545, which are directly in point. The statute not authorizing the appeal, we have no jurisdiction of the subject-matter; and consent can not confer it.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Nabers v. Morris Mining Co., 103 Ala. 543 (Ala. 1893).
103 Ala. 543 (Nabers v. Morris Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
W. K. Syson Timber Co. v. State
123 So. 293 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)
Smith v. Smith
120 So. 167 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1928)
Jackson v. Jackson
100 So. 332 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Bell v. King
98 So. 796 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1924)
Throne Franklin Shoe Co. v. Gunn
123 Ala. 640 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
State ex rel Crow v. Crook
123 Ala. 657 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Richardson v. First National Bank
119 Ala. 286 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1898)
Buford v. Ward
108 Ala. 307 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1895)