Nabers v. Long

92 So. 444, 207 Ala. 270, 1922 Ala. LEXIS 45

• Court: Supreme Court of Alabama
• Decided: April 6, 1922
• Docket: 6 Div. 586.
• Status: Published

Opinion

•SOMERVILLE, J.

The action is for damages for breach of a written contract by which defendant agreed to sell to plaintiff his interest in the Long Mercantile Company.

On the issue of tender of performance vel non by the plaintiff, the trial judge instructed the jury at defendant’s request that the burden was bn plaintiff to satisfy them by a preponderance of the evidence, and “if he has failed to so satisfy you as to any material allegation of the complaint, then you should find' for the defendant, Long.”

Instructions which require that the jury be satisfied, instead of reasonably satisfied, exact too high a degree of proof, and their giving is prejudicial error which requires a reversal of the judgment, if adverse. Miller v. Whittington, 202 Ala. 406, 411, 80 South, 499, citing Torrey v. Burney, 113 Ala. 490, 21 South. 348, and other eases.

We need not now determine whether the trial court was in error in refusing to give for plaintiff the general affirmative charge, as requested.

For the error noted above, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded.

Reversed and remanded.

ANDERSON, C. J., and McOLELLAN and' THOMAS, JJ., concur.