NAB Construction Corp. v. New York City Paper Mill, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

NAB Construction Corp. v. New York City Paper Mill, Inc.

265 A.D.2d 312, 696 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9644

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1999·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

—In an action for an accounting and to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated July 13, 1998, which granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the cause of action for an accounting insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the cause of action for an accounting insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiff failed to allege, inter alia, that it made a demand on the respondent for an accounting, that the respondent was in possession of the books, records, profits, or other assets of the alleged joint venture, and that it failed or refused to provide such an accounting (see, Conroy v Cadillac Fairview Shopping Ctr. Props., 143 AD2d 726; Roger C. Arrants, M.D., P. C. v Robert J. Dell Angelo, M.D., P. C., 73 AD2d 633).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action for an accounting and to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Golia, J.), dated July 13, 1998, which granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the cause of action for an accounting insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the respondent’s motion to dismiss the cause of action for an accounting insofar as asserted against it for failure to state a cause of action. The plaintiff failed to allege, inter alia, that it made a demand on the respondent for an accounting, that the respondent was in possession of the books, records, profits, or other assets of the alleged joint venture, and that it failed or refused to provide such an accounting (see, Conroy v Cadillac Fairview Shopping Ctr. Props., 143 AD2d 726; Roger C. Arrants, M.D., P. C. v Robert J. Dell Angelo, M.D., P. C., 73 AD2d 633).

The appellant’s remaining contention is without merit. O’Brien, J. P., Ritter, Joy, Altman and Smith, JJ., concur.

NAB Construction Corp. v. New York City Paper Mill, Inc., 265 A.D.2d 312, 696 N.Y.S.2d 224, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9644 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

Pincite

265 A.D.2d 312 (NAB Construction Corp. v. New York City Paper Mill, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related