NAB Construction Corp. v. Great American Insurance Companies

424 N.E.2d 545, 53 N.Y.2d 964, 441 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2512
New York Court of Appeals·Decided June 2, 1981·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

*966 OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed, without costs, and the question certified answered in the affirmative.

We cannot say, as a matter of law, that the newly discovered evidence presented by plaintiff was insufficient to justify a grant of plaintiff’s motion to renew. In view of this new evidence, a question of fact exists as to whether defendant could properly cancel plaintiff’s insurance policy for nonpayment of premiums. Hence, summary judgment was properly denied.

We have examined the parties’ remaining contentions and have found them to be without merit.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler, Fuchsberg and Meyer concur in memorandum.

Order affirmed, etc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NAB Construction Corp. v. Great American Insurance Companies, 424 N.E.2d 545, 53 N.Y.2d 964, 441 N.Y.S.2d 658, 1981 N.Y. LEXIS 2512 (N.Y. 1981).

424 N.E.2d 545 (NAB Construction Corp. v. Great American Insurance Companies) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stone v. Bridgehampton Race Circuit
244 A.D.2d 403 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1997)
Levitt v. County of Suffolk
166 A.D.2d 421 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1990)
Harrell v. Koppers Company, Inc.
154 A.D.2d 340 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)