Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc.. Read the opinion of the Court — 915 F.3d 617
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided May 7, 2020·No. 17-55723·Unpublished

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 7 2020 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF No. 17-55723 AFRICAN-AMERICAN OWNED MEDIA, a California Limited Liability Company; D.C. No. ENTERTAINMENT STUDIOS 2:16-cv-00609-GW-FFM NETWORKS, INC., a California corporation, ORDER* Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., a Delaware corporation,

Defendant-Appellant.

On Remand from the United States Supreme Court

Before: SCHROEDER, M. SMITH, and NGUYEN, Circuit Judges.

On March 30, 2020, the U.S. Supreme Court granted Appellant’s petition for

certiorari, vacated our opinion filed February 4, 2019, and remanded for further

consideration in light of Comcast Corp. v. National Assn. of African American-

Owned Media, 589 U. S. ___ (2020). We hereby VACATE the district court’s

decision and REMAND for further proceedings consistent with Comcast.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc., (9th Cir. 2020).

Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc. (Naaaom v. Charter Communications, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.