Na Aikane O Maui v. Intermediate Court of Appeals of the State of Hawai'i

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

27-FEB-2026

11:07 AM

Dkt. 9 ODDP

SCPW-XX-XXXXXXX

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI

________________________________________________________________

NA AIKANE O MAUI; LAHAINA JODO MISSION;

LAHAINA YACHT CLUB; and KUSINA ASIAN MARKET LLC, Petitioners,

vs.

INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF HAWAIʻI, Respondent Court,

and

AMGUARD INSURANCE COMPANY, et al.; and CERTAIN UNDERWRITERS AT LLOYD’S LONDON SUBSCRIBING TO POLICY NUMBER TRIB223061, et al., Respondents.

________________________________________________________________

ORIGINAL PROCEEDING

(CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX; CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX;

CASE NOS. 2CCV-XX-XXXXXXX; 2CCV-XX-XXXXXXX)

ORDER DENYING PETITION

(By: McKenna, Acting C.J., Eddins, and Ginoza, JJ., Circuit Judge Somerville, in place of Devens, J., and Circuit Judge Tomasa, assigned by reason of vacancy)

Upon consideration of the petition for writ of mandamus or alternate relief, filed February 12, 2026, and the record,

Rivera v. Cataldo, 153 Hawaiʻi 320, 537 P.3d 1167 (2023), is distinguishable from this case. There, compensation to thousands of people for land trust breaches that occurred between August 21, 1959 and June 30, 1988, was delayed because a single person erroneously believed that compensation was also owed to that person. Id. at 323-26, 537 P.3d at 1170-73.

Here, the petition was filed just two days after our February 10, 2026 opinion in Burnes v. Hawaiian Elec. Co., Inc., ___ P.3d ___, No. SCAP-XX-XXXXXXX, 2026 WL 370176 (Haw. Feb. 10, 2026), or during the reconsideration period. See Hawaiʻi Rules of Appellate Procedure Rule 40(a) (2000). The notices of appeal in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX were filed on January 20 and 21, 2026, respectively, or before this court’s February 10, 2026 opinion in Burnes.

Also, the records on appeal in CAAP-XX-XXXXXXX and CAAP-26-

0000045 had not been filed when the petition was filed in this case. And the records still haven’t been filed.

Petitioners have alternatives to obtain the relief sought in this petition through normal appellate procedures, which include expedited resolution of the pending appeals. An extraordinary writ is unwarranted. See Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP v. Kim, 153 Hawaiʻi 307, 319, 537 P.3d 1154, 1166 (2023).

3

It is ordered that the petition is denied.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawaiʻi, February 27, 2026.

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Todd W. Eddins

/s/ Lisa M. Ginoza

/s/ Rowena A. Somerville

/s/ Taryn R. Tomasa