N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner

Fifth Circuit

N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner

345 F.2d 472

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedMay 20, 1965

Docket21608

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 345 F.2d 472 (N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner, 345 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The evidence in this suit for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by a ship passenger demonstrated that the passenger may have been in a situation of danger, and that under the circumstances appellant may have owed a duty to the passenger to warn her of the danger. Questions for the jury were thus presented and the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for directed verdict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The evidence in this suit for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by a ship passenger demonstrated that the passenger may have been in a situation of danger, and that under the circumstances appellant may have owed a duty to the passenger to warn her of the danger. Questions for the jury were thus presented and the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for directed verdict.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

345 F.2d 472, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-v-stoomvaart-maatschappij-nederland-v-genevieve-throner-ca5-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack