N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner

Fifth Circuit

N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner

345 F.2d 472

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided May 20, 1965·No. 21608·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The evidence in this suit for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by a ship passenger demonstrated that the passenger may have been in a situation of danger, and that under the circumstances appellant may have owed a duty to the passenger to warn her of the danger. Questions for the jury were thus presented and the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for directed verdict.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

The evidence in this suit for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained by a ship passenger demonstrated that the passenger may have been in a situation of danger, and that under the circumstances appellant may have owed a duty to the passenger to warn her of the danger. Questions for the jury were thus presented and the court did not err in denying appellant’s motion for directed verdict.

Affirmed.

N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner, 345 F.2d 472 (5th Cir. 1965).

Pincite

345 F.2d 472 (N. v. Stoomvaart Maatschappij "Nederland" v. Genevieve Throner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related