N. S. L. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

N. S. L. v. State

356 So. 2d 66, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15527

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 14, 1978

DocketNo. 77-1951

StatusPublished

This text of 356 So. 2d 66 (N. S. L. v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N. S. L. v. State, 356 So. 2d 66, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15527 (Fla. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

NATHAN, Judge.

N.S.L., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with burglary and grand larceny. He was tried and adjudicated delinquent for burglary and petit larceny. Careful review of the record discloses that the trial court erred in entering an adjudication of delinquency, as the evidence in this case fails to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence that may be derived from the facts. Mayo v. State, 71 So.2d 899, 904 (Fla.1954); Sanders v. State, 344 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NATHAN, Judge.

N.S.L., a juvenile, was charged by petition for delinquency with burglary and grand larceny. He was tried and adjudicated delinquent for burglary and petit larceny. Careful review of the record discloses that the trial court erred in entering an adjudication of delinquency, as the evidence in this case fails to exclude every reasonable hypothesis of innocence that may be derived from the facts. Mayo v. State, 71 So.2d 899, 904 (Fla.1954); Sanders v. State, 344 So.2d 876 (Fla. 4th DCA 1977).

Reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

356 So. 2d 66, 1978 Fla. App. LEXIS 15527, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-s-l-v-state-fladistctapp-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack