N. Olmsted Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

Ohio Supreme Court

N. Olmsted Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision

658 N.E.2d 1063, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1494

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedJanuary 11, 1996

Docket95-694

StatusPublished

This text of 658 N.E.2d 1063 (N. Olmsted Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N. Olmsted Bd. of Edn. v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Revision, 658 N.E.2d 1063, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1494 (Ohio 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 93-A-347 and 93-A-348. On January 4, 1996, appellant filed a notice of additional authority in support of its motion to dismiss. It appears to the court that appellant’s notice is, in substance, a reply memorandum. Whereas, there is no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice for filling reply memoranda and, whereas appellant’s notice also violates the prohibition against additional briefing after oral argument in S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(8),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective January 9, 1996, that appellant’s notice of •additional authority be, and hereby is, stricken.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Board of Tax Appeals, Nos. 93-A-347 and 93-A-348. On January 4, 1996, appellant filed a notice of additional authority in support of its motion to dismiss. It appears to the court that appellant’s notice is, in substance, a reply memorandum. Whereas, there is no provision in the Supreme Court Rules of Practice for filling reply memoranda and, whereas appellant’s notice also violates the prohibition against additional briefing after oral argument in S.Ct.Prac.R. IX(8),

IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, effective January 9, 1996, that appellant’s notice of •additional authority be, and hereby is, stricken.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

658 N.E.2d 1063, 74 Ohio St. 3d 1494, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-olmsted-bd-of-edn-v-cuyahoga-cty-bd-of-revision-ohio-1996.