N. Marsico v. Sherman Oil Mill

272 S.W. 1119, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 443
CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 26, 1925
DocketNo. 3083.
StatusPublished

This text of 272 S.W. 1119 (N. Marsico v. Sherman Oil Mill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
N. Marsico v. Sherman Oil Mill, 272 S.W. 1119, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 443 (Tex. Ct. App. 1925).

Opinion

HODGES, J.

. This suit was filed by the ap-pellee to recover the sum of $387.60 as the balance due for the purchase price of 34 bales of linters sold to the appellant. The appellant answered by exceptions and a general and special denial. In a trial before the court judgment was rendered for the full amount sued for. In this appeal complaint is made because the trial court refused a continuance when the appellee was permitted to file a trial amendment setting out in more detail facts which had been previously stated in its original petition. There was no error in the ruling complained of. Both the facts and the pleading support the judgment rendered, and it is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
272 S.W. 1119, 1925 Tex. App. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-marsico-v-sherman-oil-mill-texapp-1925.