N. Kingsville v. Maddox
789 N.E.2d 628, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1427
This text of 789 N.E.2d 628 (N. Kingsville v. Maddox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
N. Kingsville v. Maddox, 789 N.E.2d 628, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1427 (Ohio 2003).
Opinion
Ashtabula App. No. 2001-A-0052, 2002-0hio-7122. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. On May 16, 2003, appellant filed a motion for reconsideration. Whereas, the motion does not contain a proof of service as required by S.Ct.Prac.R. XIV(2)(C),
IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the motion for reconsideration be, and hereby is, stricken.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
789 N.E.2d 628, 99 Ohio St. 3d 1427, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-kingsville-v-maddox-ohio-2003.