N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley
219 A.D. 738
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided January 15, 1927·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint and for judgment reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the paper writing in question does not contain all the terms of a complete contract and indicates that the parties contemplated further negotiations to [739] reach a meeting of minds on all the essential terms. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 219 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).
219 A.D. 738 (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Monaco v. Levy
12 A.D.2d 790 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1961)