N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley

219 A.D. 738

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1927

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 219 A.D. 738 (N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N. E. D. Holding Co. v. McKinley, 219 A.D. 738 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint and for judgment reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the paper writing in question does not contain all the terms of a complete contract and indicates that the parties contemplated further negotiations to [739]*739reach a meeting of minds on all the essential terms. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss complaint and for judgment reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs, upon the ground that the paper writing in question does not contain all the terms of a complete contract and indicates that the parties contemplated further negotiations to [739]*739reach a meeting of minds on all the essential terms. Kelly, P. J., Jaycox, Manning, Kapper and Lazansky, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

219 A.D. 738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-e-d-holding-co-v-mckinley-nyappdiv-1927.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack