N. B. Fails Lubricating Co. v. Erie Railroad

New York Supreme Court

N. B. Fails Lubricating Co. v. Erie Railroad

112 N.Y.S. 432

DecidedSeptember 15, 1908

StatusPublished

This text of 112 N.Y.S. 432 (N. B. Fails Lubricating Co. v. Erie Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

N. B. Fails Lubricating Co. v. Erie Railroad, 112 N.Y.S. 432 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1908).

Pincite

Opinion

BROWN, J.

Defendant, under the bill of lading, would only be liable as common carrier for the lost merchandise upon proof that the loss occurred by reason of negligence. The merchandise, consisting of one barrel and contents, was received by defendant at its freight house on Louisiana street for shipment August 7, 1907, between 11 and 12 o’clock noon, and was destroyed by fire by burning of the freight house and contents about 9:35 p. m. of that day. It appeared that the fire was not caused by the defendant’s negligence. The alleged negligence of the defendant for which plaintiff has recovered, its judgment, consists solely of the failure of defendant to remove from its freight house and ship the merchandise prior to 9 :35 p. m. on evening of August 7th. It appeared that in the ordinary operation of its business as common carrier the defendant'had no train scheduled to leave the freight house taking merchandise in less than car load lots on August 7th prior to the fire, and it did not appear that any car was in fact taken from the freight house in which the plaintiff’s merchandise might with reasonable care have been shipped. The mere fact that the defendant failed to ship the merchandise within 10 hours of its receipt is claimed to constitute negligence. Such fact, standing alone, is not evidence of negligence.

The judgment must be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BROWN, J.

Defendant, under the bill of lading, would only be liable as common carrier for the lost merchandise upon proof that the loss occurred by reason of negligence. The merchandise, consisting of one barrel and contents, was received by defendant at its freight house on Louisiana street for shipment August 7, 1907, between 11 and 12 o’clock noon, and was destroyed by fire by burning of the freight house and contents about 9:35 p. m. of that day. It appeared that the fire was not caused by the defendant’s negligence. The alleged negligence of the defendant for which plaintiff has recovered, its judgment, consists solely of the failure of defendant to remove from its freight house and ship the merchandise prior to 9 :35 p. m. on evening of August 7th. It appeared that in the ordinary operation of its business as common carrier the defendant'had no train scheduled to leave the freight house taking merchandise in less than car load lots on August 7th prior to the fire, and it did not appear that any car was in fact taken from the freight house in which the plaintiff’s merchandise might with reasonable care have been shipped. The mere fact that the defendant failed to ship the merchandise within 10 hours of its receipt is claimed to constitute negligence. Such fact, standing alone, is not evidence of negligence.

The judgment must be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 N.Y.S. 432, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/n-b-fails-lubricating-co-v-erie-railroad-nysupct-1908.