N. Angell Son v. Charles L. Bowler

3 R.I. 77
Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided September 6, 1854·Published

Opinion

Staples, C. J.

The officer’s return is conclusive, and *78 cannot be controverted incidentally by motion or plea, except in cases specially provided for by statute. Errors apparent on the record can be taken advantage of by motion as well as plea. But it never has been permitted for a defendant to falsify the record by his affidavit, and then take advantage of an error thus made apparent.

Motion overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

N. Angell Son v. Charles L. Bowler, 3 R.I. 77 (R.I. 1854).

3 R.I. 77 (N. Angell Son v. Charles L. Bowler) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.