Mytee Products, Inc . v. Harris Research, Inc.

Federal Circuit

Mytee Products, Inc . v. Harris Research, Inc.

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

DecidedJanuary 19, 2011

Docket2010-1457

StatusUnpublished

This text of Mytee Products, Inc . v. Harris Research, Inc. (Mytee Products, Inc . v. Harris Research, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mytee Products, Inc . v. Harris Research, Inc., (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit MYTEE PRODUCTS, INC., Plain,tiff-Appellant, v. ' HARRIS RESEARCH, INC., Defen.dant-Appellee, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, Defendants. 2010-1457 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ca1ifornia in case no. 06-CV-1854, Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann BenciVengo. ON MOTION ORDER Mytee Products, Inc. moves for an extension of time, until Nove1nber 2, 2010, to file its opening brief The court notes that Mytee Products, Inc.’s initial Brief was rejected on October 19, 2010 and the corrected brief was

MYTEE PRODUCTS V. HARRIS RESEARCH 2 due NoVember 2, 2010. Therefore, the motion is unneces- sary. Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is moot. FOR THE COURT JAN 1 9 2011 /s/ Jan Horba1y ' Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Frederick K. Tay1or, Esq. - Shaun L. Peck, Esq. Fll.ED ' S21 U.S. CDURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL GIRCUIT JAN19201| .|AN |'EiRBAL¥ C|.EFI(

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

NOTE: This order is nonprecedential. United States Court of AppeaIs for the Federal Circuit MYTEE PRODUCTS, INC., Plain,tiff-Appellant, v. ' HARRIS RESEARCH, INC., Defen.dant-Appellee, and DOES 1 THROUGH 20, Defendants. 2010-1457 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ca1ifornia in case no. 06-CV-1854, Magistrate Judge Cathy Ann BenciVengo. ON MOTION ORDER Mytee Products, Inc. moves for an extension of time, until Nove1nber 2, 2010, to file its opening brief The court notes that Mytee Products, Inc.’s initial Brief was rejected on October 19, 2010 and the corrected brief was

MYTEE PRODUCTS V. HARRIS RESEARCH 2 due NoVember 2, 2010. Therefore, the motion is unneces- sary. Upon consideration thereof, IT ls ORDERED THAT: The motion is moot. FOR THE COURT JAN 1 9 2011 /s/ Jan Horba1y ' Date J an Horba1y C1erk cc: Frederick K. Tay1or, Esq. - Shaun L. Peck, Esq. Fll.ED ' S21 U.S. CDURT 0F APPEALS FOR THE FEDERAL GIRCUIT JAN19201| .|AN |'EiRBAL¥ C|.EFI(

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Mytee Products, Inc . v. Harris Research, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mytee-products-inc-v-harris-research-inc-cafc-2011.