Mysiak v. Supreme Court

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mysiak v. Supreme Court

12 A.D.2d 650, 210 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6443

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 15, 1960

StatusPublished

This text of 12 A.D.2d 650 (Mysiak v. Supreme Court) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mysiak v. Supreme Court, 12 A.D.2d 650, 210 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6443 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

Petition, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit the Supreme Court in Nassau County, one of its Justices, and the petitioners in a habeas corpus proceeding presently pending in said court before such Justice, from taking any further action in said habeas corpus proceeding on the ground that the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction. Cross motions by respondents, pursuant to section 1293 of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to dismiss the said petition as a matter of law, on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to entitle petitioners to relief. Cross motions granted and petition dismissed. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Petition, pursuant to article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to prohibit the Supreme Court in Nassau County, one of its Justices, and the petitioners in a habeas corpus proceeding presently pending in said court before such Justice, from taking any further action in said habeas corpus proceeding on the ground that the Supreme Court is without jurisdiction. Cross motions by respondents, pursuant to section 1293 of article 78 of the Civil Practice Act, to dismiss the said petition as a matter of law, on the ground that it fails to state facts sufficient to entitle petitioners to relief. Cross motions granted and petition dismissed. Beldock, Acting P. J., Ughetta, Kleinfeld, Christ and Pette, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

12 A.D.2d 650, 210 N.Y.S.2d 792, 1960 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mysiak-v-supreme-court-nyappdiv-1960.