Myrtle v. Bank of New York
Opinion
|N THE D|STR|CT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLOR|DA FIFTH D|STR|CT
7825 N|YRTLE OAK LANE, LLC AND ANDREW LA ROSA,
Appe||ants, v. ` Case No. 5D15-74 BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON, ETC., ET AL.,
Appe||ees.
Opinion filed June 17, 2016
Appea| from the Circuit Court for Osceo|a County, Robert J. Pleus, Jr., Senior Judge.
Jose G. Oliveira, of Jose G. O|iveira, P.A., Or|ando, and Raymer F. Maguire, I||, of Maguire, Lassman, P.A., Or|ando, for Appe||ants.
Nancy M. Wa|lace and Michael J. Larson, of Akerman LLF’, Ta||ahassee, and Wi||iam
P. He||er, of Akerman LLP, Fort Lauderda|e, for Appe||ees.
OP|N|ON ON |V|OT|ON FOR REHEAR|NG AND CLAR|F|CAT|ON
PER CUR|AM.
This cause is before us on Appellee's Motion for Rehearing and Clarif\cation of
Order Granting Attorneys’ Fees. We deny the motion for rehearing, but grant the
motion for clarification based on Appellant, 7825 Myrtle Oak Lane, LLC’s, confession of error. inasmuch as 7825 l\/lyrtle Oak Lane, LLC, is not entitled to an award of attorney’s
fees, we clarify that the April 22, 2016 order awarding attorney’s fees shall apply only to
Appellant, Andrew La Rosa. REHEARING DEN|ED; CLARlFlCATlON GRANTED.
BERGER, LAMBERT and EDWARDS, concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Myrtle v. Bank of New York (Myrtle v. Bank of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.