Myron L. De Mars and Ernest O. Short v. United States

254 F.2d 594, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 6096
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit·Decided April 21, 1958·No. 13481_1·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant challenges the the validity of the judgment and sentence of the appellant for violation of the Migratory Bird Treaty Act, 16 U.S.C.A. § 703 et seq. and the Regulations published thereunder in 1955 by the Secretary of the Interior. The trial was had to a jury which returned a verdict of guilty as charged. There was substantial evidence to sustain the verdict and we find no prejudicial error in the proceedings therein. While the appellant contends that the sentence of both fine and imprisonment was unusually harsh by comparison with other cases of sim *595 ilar nature, it was within the limits fixed by the Act and we have no power to modify it. Wherefore,

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myron L. De Mars and Ernest O. Short v. United States, 254 F.2d 594, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 6096 (6th Cir. 1958).

254 F.2d 594 (Myron L. De Mars and Ernest O. Short v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Abbate
439 F. Supp. 2d 625 (E.D. Louisiana, 2006)
United States v. Coleman Herbert Dudley
436 F.2d 1057 (Sixth Circuit, 1971)
United States v. Daniels
319 F. Supp. 1061 (E.D. Kentucky, 1970)
United States v. Joseph A. Gargano
338 F.2d 893 (Sixth Circuit, 1964)