Myron ex rel. Brock v. Doctors General, Ltd.

571 So. 2d 591, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9778, 1990 WL 211757
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 28, 1990
DocketNo. 90-2769
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 571 So. 2d 591 (Myron ex rel. Brock v. Doctors General, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myron ex rel. Brock v. Doctors General, Ltd., 571 So. 2d 591, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9778, 1990 WL 211757 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinion

DOWNEY, Judge.

Petitioners seek certiorari review of orders of the trial court which direct the production and release of H.R.S. records to the respondents and their experts over objection of the petitioners.

The underlying litigation involves a medical malpractice claim filed by Rayna Myron and her parents and natural guardians against several doctors and hospitals. During the pendency of the case, certain H.R.S. records in the form of progress notes relating to Rayna Myron came into the possession of the trial judge. He authorized an in camera inspection of said notes by petitioners. After examining the records, petitioners objected to their being reviewed by respondents. The trial court overruled those objections but granted petitioners’ motion for clarification, and thereafter ruled that the records were privileged, confidential matters as to everyone but the defendants and their experts and were not to be published to outside parties who had no interest in the lawsuit. In sum, the trial court ruled the records were [592]*592privileged and confidential as to all persons except the parties to this cause, their expert witnesses, and the jury. We find no departure from the essential requirements of law in that ruling. However, in denying the petition, we wish to make it clear that we are dealing with the scope of the privilege and the extent of the confidentiality of said records, and not as to any other objections to their admissibility at trial. Such objections to their admissibility must await the trial setting and the trial judge’s rulings thereon.

Certiorari denied.

POLEN and GARRETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Myron v. Doctors General Hospital, Ltd.
704 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)
Myron Ex Rel. Brock v. DOCTORS GENERAL HOSP.
704 So. 2d 1083 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
571 So. 2d 591, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 9778, 1990 WL 211757, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myron-ex-rel-brock-v-doctors-general-ltd-fladistctapp-1990.