Myrick v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Myrick v. State

1914 OK CR 47, 140 P. 788, 10 Okla. Crim. 615, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 191

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMay 18, 1914

DocketNo. A-2038.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 47 (Myrick v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myrick v. State, 1914 OK CR 47, 140 P. 788, 10 Okla. Crim. 615, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 191 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county upon an information which charged a violation of section 2546 of the Penal Code. On May 2, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a'period of 60 days. To reverse the judgment, an appeal was taken.

No briefs have been filed, and, when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff *616 in error. Thereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

We have examined the record proper, and have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The motion to affirm the judgment is therefore sustained.

ARMSTRONG, P. J., and FURMAN, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DOYLE, J.

Plaintiff in error was convicted in the county court of Choctaw county upon an information which charged a violation of section 2546 of the Penal Code. On May 2, 1913, in accordance with the verdict of the jury, he was by the court sentenced to be confined in the county jail for a'period of 60 days. To reverse the judgment, an appeal was taken.

No briefs have been filed, and, when the case was called for final submission, no appearance was made on behalf of plaintiff *616 in error. Thereupon the Attorney General moved to affirm the judgment for failure to prosecute the appeal.

We have examined the record proper, and have discovered no error which will warrant a reversal of the judgment. The motion to affirm the judgment is therefore sustained.

ARMSTRONG, P. J., and FURMAN, J., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 47, 140 P. 788, 10 Okla. Crim. 615, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 191, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myrick-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.