Myrick v. . Bishop

8 N.C. 485
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedJune 5, 1821
StatusPublished
Cited by7 cases

This text of 8 N.C. 485 (Myrick v. . Bishop) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myrick v. . Bishop, 8 N.C. 485 (N.C. 1821).

Opinions

* This cause and the two immediately following it, were decided at June Term, 1821, but from accident were omitted in the report of cases of that term. The plaintiff, having a deed covering the land where the trespass was committed, and being in possession of part within the boundaries of the deed, was in actual possession of the whole. The deed ascertained the extent of the possession. Whoever is in possession may maintain an action of trespass against a wrongdoer to his possession, because it is a possessory remedy, founded merely on the possession, and it (486) is not necessary that the right should come in question. 3 Burr., 1563; 1 East, 246. The judgment must be

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Motley v. Thompson
131 S.E.2d 447 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1963)
Hayes v. Williamson-Brown Lumber Co.
104 S.E. 527 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1920)
Ray v. . Anders
80 S.E. 403 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1913)
Frisbee v. Town of Marshall
30 S.E. 21 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1898)
Osborne v. . Ballew
34 N.C. 373 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1851)
Pearson v. . Smith
1 N.C. 531 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1802)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
8 N.C. 485, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myrick-v-bishop-nc-1821.