Myrick v. Atkinson, Jr.

E.D. North Carolina

Myrick v. Atkinson, Jr.

CourtDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina

DecidedApril 27, 2021

Docket4:20-cv-00139

StatusUnknown

This text of Myrick v. Atkinson, Jr. (Myrick v. Atkinson, Jr.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myrick v. Atkinson, Jr., (E.D.N.C. 2021).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION

NO. 4:20-CV-139-FL

JOEROAM MYRICK as an Individual and ) as Representative on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) CLEVELAND ATKINSON, JR. ) as Sheriff of Edgecombe County; and ) EDGECOMBE COUNTY, ) ) Defendants. )

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 16) and motion to stay (DE 18), as well as plaintiff’s motion for leave to file first amended complaint (DE 24). Where “leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires,” Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 426 (4th Cir. 2006) (en banc), and where defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s motion, plaintiff’s motion (DE 24) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file his first amended complaint within seven days of the date of this order. In addition, where “an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect,” Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001), defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 16) is DENIED AS MOOT. Finally, the court has considered defendants’ motion to stay and plaintiff’s opposition thereto. Where defendants assert that they will seek to file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to stay (DE18), and the court STAYS scheduling conference activities pending the framing of the pleadings. SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of April, 2021.

C fe W. FLANASAN United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN DIVISION

NO. 4:20-CV-139-FL

JOEROAM MYRICK as an Individual and ) as Representative on behalf of all others ) similarly situated, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ORDER ) CLEVELAND ATKINSON, JR. ) as Sheriff of Edgecombe County; and ) EDGECOMBE COUNTY, ) ) Defendants. )

This matter is before the court on defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 16) and motion to stay (DE 18), as well as plaintiff’s motion for leave to file first amended complaint (DE 24). Where “leave to amend shall be freely given when justice so requires,” Laber v. Harvey, 438 F.3d 404, 426 (4th Cir. 2006) (en banc), and where defendants do not oppose plaintiff’s motion, plaintiff’s motion (DE 24) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is DIRECTED to file his first amended complaint within seven days of the date of this order. In addition, where “an amended pleading ordinarily supersedes the original and renders it of no legal effect,” Young v. City of Mount Ranier, 238 F.3d 567, 573 (4th Cir. 2001), defendants’ motion to dismiss (DE 16) is DENIED AS MOOT. Finally, the court has considered defendants’ motion to stay and plaintiff’s opposition thereto. Where defendants assert that they will seek to file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint, the court GRANTS defendants’ motion to stay (DE18), and the court STAYS scheduling conference activities pending the framing of the pleadings. SO ORDERED, this the 27th day of April, 2021.

C fe W. FLANASAN United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Myrick v. Atkinson, Jr., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myrick-v-atkinson-jr-nced-2021.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack