Myres v. Roundtree
This text of 1 Ky. Op. 175 (Myres v. Roundtree) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion oe the Court by
Tbe testator, Henry Roundtree, provided in bis will tbat bis widow should sell certain town lots, and 100 acres of land in [176]*176Green county to pay his debts, and if they proved insufficient for that purpose, she was directed to sell so much of his personal estate as might be required to pay the residue thereof.
The 100 acres of land as appears by the evidence were lost to the estate, and it does not appear that the town lots have been sold; the debts, from the lapse of time since the testator’s death, we must presume have all been paid by her without the sale of any real estate.
Mrs. Koundtree had the misfortune to lose her work stock, and had not the means to cultivate her lands. She had, as is shown from the evidence, a considerable family, nearly all females, and unable to do field labor; she was an economical, prudent woman, and in order to make her land productive she was compelled to have stock to cultivate it; and the timber'which was sold could be more conveniently spared than anything else she had, and from the conflict in the evidence, it is even doubtful whether the sale and removal of the timber was of serious detriment to the inheritance. We are not satisfied that the judgment is erroneous and it is, therefore, affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 Ky. Op. 175, 1866 Ky. LEXIS 252, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myres-v-roundtree-kyctapp-1866.