Myles v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Myles v. State

503 S.W.3d 327, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1166, 2016 WL 6695384

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 15, 2016·No. ED 103772·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Myles appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after a partial evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Leroy Myles appeals from the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 29.15¹ motion for post-conviction relief after a partial evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the findings and conclusions of the motion court are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Footnotes

Myles v. State, 503 S.W.3d 327, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1166, 2016 WL 6695384 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

503 S.W.3d 327 (Myles v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.