Myles v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Myles v. State

280 So. 2d 516, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJuly 20, 1973

DocketNo. 73-158

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 280 So. 2d 516 (Myles v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myles v. State, 280 So. 2d 516, 1973 Fla. App. LEXIS 7873 (Fla. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Jessie L. Myles, timely appeals to this -court from an order entered by the Hillsborough County Circuit Court summarily denying a post-conviction motion brought under RCrP 3.850 33 F.S.A.

Appellant was charged in a one count information with the offense of robbery. He pled not guilty, was tried by jury, convicted, and sentenced to a term in the state prison. He filed a direct appeal and this court, in Patterson et al. v. State, Fla.App.1972, 263 So.2d 593, affirmed.

We have reviewed the record, considered the points raised on the appeal by appellant and find them to be without merit, being based on mere allegation, without more. See rationale of Davis v. State, Fla.App.1973, 277 So.2d 790. The record does not support the contention of appellant that he is entitled to an eviden-tiary hearing.

We point out that the “MOTION TO VACATE CONVICTION/SENTENCE” filed by appellant, pro se, challenged the legality of jury selection in Hillsborough County. With regard to this point see the special concurring opinion of Chief Judge Mann of this court in the case of Latson v. State, Fla.App.1973, 276 So.2d 496.

Appellant, having failed to demonstrate reversible error we, accordingly,

Affirm.

MANN, C. J., and LILES and BOARD-MAN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI