Myler v. Wittish

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Myler v. Wittish

53 A. 758, 204 Pa. 180, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 619

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedNovember 10, 1902

DocketAppeal, No. 9

StatusPublished

This text of 53 A. 758 (Myler v. Wittish) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myler v. Wittish, 53 A. 758, 204 Pa. 180, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 619 (Pa. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,.

Before judgment was entered for want of an appearance, the defendant had appeared in court personally, and by counsel on the hearing of a motion to dissolve the attachment. He had been served with a rule to plead, and had filed an answer and. a demurrer.

The court treated this as equivalent to a formal appearance and we think properly so.

The order striking off the judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,.

Before judgment was entered for want of an appearance, the defendant had appeared in court personally, and by counsel on the hearing of a motion to dissolve the attachment. He had been served with a rule to plead, and had filed an answer and. a demurrer.

The court treated this as equivalent to a formal appearance and we think properly so.

The order striking off the judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

53 A. 758, 204 Pa. 180, 1902 Pa. LEXIS 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myler-v-wittish-pa-1902.