Mykap Realty Corp. v. Goodman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Mykap Realty Corp. v. Goodman

5 A.D.2d 780, 169 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7298

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 13, 1958

StatusPublished

This text of 5 A.D.2d 780 (Mykap Realty Corp. v. Goodman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mykap Realty Corp. v. Goodman, 5 A.D.2d 780, 169 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7298 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Appellant, the former mortgagee, made a motion pursuant to section 985 of the Civil Practice Act for an order in the nature of a writ of assistance to put the purchaser at the foreclosure sale in possession of an apartment occupied by the former mortgagor and owner. The appeal is -from so much of the order granting the motion as stays the execution thereof upon the condition that the occupant pay the fixed monthly rental for the use of the apartment. Order modified by adding to the second ordering paragraph after the words “is stayed” the words and figures “until February 13, 1958”, and as so modified order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. While the stay was properly granted, it is our opinion that the indefinite stay of the execution of the order was an abuse of discretion. Accordingly the order is modified so as to limit the stay until 30 days after the entry of the order determining this appeal.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appellant, the former mortgagee, made a motion pursuant to section 985 of the Civil Practice Act for an order in the nature of a writ of assistance to put the purchaser at the foreclosure sale in possession of an apartment occupied by the former mortgagor and owner. The appeal is -from so much of the order granting the motion as stays the execution thereof upon the condition that the occupant pay the fixed monthly rental for the use of the apartment. Order modified by adding to the second ordering paragraph after the words “is stayed” the words and figures “until February 13, 1958”, and as so modified order insofar as appealed from affirmed, without costs. While the stay was properly granted, it is our opinion that the indefinite stay of the execution of the order was an abuse of discretion. Accordingly the order is modified so as to limit the stay until 30 days after the entry of the order determining this appeal.

Wenzel, Acting P. J., Beldoek, Ughetta, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

5 A.D.2d 780, 169 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7298, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mykap-realty-corp-v-goodman-nyappdiv-1958.