Mygatt v. Willcox

35 How. Pr. 410
CourtNew York Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 15, 1868
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 35 How. Pr. 410 (Mygatt v. Willcox) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Mygatt v. Willcox, 35 How. Pr. 410 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1868).

Opinion

Murray, Jr., J.

The opening of the cause, introduction of evidence, and summing up by counsel to the jury, or submitting of the cause to the court or referee on written points and arguments, after the evidence is closed, are parts of the trial of an issue of fact.

Such trial is not completed until finally submitted to the court, referee or jury.

In cases in which more than two days are necessarily occupied in completing the trial, including the preparation and submission of written points or arguments, if that way of submission is agreed upon, the party succeeding is entitled to the additional $10, under subdivision 4 of section 307 of the Code.

In this case it being conceded, that more than two days was necessarily occupied in the trial, if the preparation and submission of written points or arguments are to be included as a part of the trial, there -should be a re-adjustment of the costs in this action, and the clerk of Chenango county should allow plaintiff the additional $10 under said subdivision, formerly rejected by him.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Washburne v. Oliver
62 How. Pr. 482 (Erie County Court, 1882)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 How. Pr. 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mygatt-v-willcox-nysupct-1868.