Mygatt v. Coe

New York Supreme Court

Mygatt v. Coe

31 N.Y.S. 1130, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 877

DecidedDecember 14, 1894

StatusPublished

This text of 31 N.Y.S. 1130 (Mygatt v. Coe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Mygatt v. Coe, 31 N.Y.S. 1130, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 877 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1894).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover damages for breach of defendant’s covenants of quiet enjoyment and of warranty. The case has-been three times tried, twice appealed to this court, and twice to the court of appeals. 44 Hun, 31; 124 N. Y. 212, 26 N. E. 611; 20 N. Y. Supp. 748; 142 N. Y. 78, 36 N. E. 870. In view of the discussion which this case has already provoked, it would serve no-useful purpose to ventilate anew either the law or the facts; it being sufficient to say that, apart from. [1131]*1131previous opinions expressed or the individual views of the members of this court, upon the facts' as now found, we must regard the last opinion of the court of appeals as controlling in respondents’ favor. Judgment accordingly affirmed, with costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This action was brought to recover damages for breach of defendant’s covenants of quiet enjoyment and of warranty. The case has-been three times tried, twice appealed to this court, and twice to the court of appeals. 44 Hun, 31; 124 N. Y. 212, 26 N. E. 611; 20 N. Y. Supp. 748; 142 N. Y. 78, 36 N. E. 870. In view of the discussion which this case has already provoked, it would serve no-useful purpose to ventilate anew either the law or the facts; it being sufficient to say that, apart from. [1131]*1131previous opinions expressed or the individual views of the members of this court, upon the facts' as now found, we must regard the last opinion of the court of appeals as controlling in respondents’ favor. Judgment accordingly affirmed, with costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

31 N.Y.S. 1130, 90 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 612, 64 N.Y. St. Rep. 877, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mygatt-v-coe-nysupct-1894.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack