Myers v. Urich
1 Binn. 25, 1801 Pa. LEXIS 1
Opinion
The ground of the defence is that Urich was compelled by due course of law to pay the amount of the bond to the plaintiff in the foreign attachment; but the fact is that he was not compelled by due course of law; for he could not be legally compelled unless the proceedings against him were regular, and the security required by the act of Assembly was duly entered.
Judgment for Plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Myers v. Urich, 1 Binn. 25, 1801 Pa. LEXIS 1 (Pa. 1801).
1 Binn. 25 (Myers v. Urich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
McPhail & Co. v. Hyatt
29 Iowa 137 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)
Adams v. Filer
7 Wis. 306 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)
Hall v. Knapp
1 Pa. 213 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1845)
Wood v. Ludwig
5 Serg. & Rawle 446 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1820)