Myers v. Urich
1 Binn. 25, 1801 Pa. LEXIS 1
This text of 1 Binn. 25 (Myers v. Urich) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Myers v. Urich, 1 Binn. 25, 1801 Pa. LEXIS 1 (Pa. 1801).
Opinion
The ground of the defence is that Urich was compelled by due course of law to pay the amount of the bond to the plaintiff in the foreign attachment; but the fact is that he was not compelled by due course of law; for he could not be legally compelled unless the proceedings against him were regular, and the security required by the act of Assembly was duly entered.
Judgment for Plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
McPhail & Co. v. Hyatt
29 Iowa 137 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1870)
Adams v. Filer
7 Wis. 306 (Wisconsin Supreme Court, 1859)
Hall v. Knapp
1 Pa. 213 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1845)
Wood v. Ludwig
5 Serg. & Rawle 446 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1820)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 Binn. 25, 1801 Pa. LEXIS 1, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-urich-pa-1801.