Myers v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Myers v. State

146 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 700, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 107

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedMarch 6, 1914

DocketNo. A-2145.

StatusPublished

This text of 146 P. 1198 (Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. State, 146 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 700, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 107 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE CUEIAM.

John Myers, the plaintiff in error, was convicted at the October, 1913, term of the county court of Osage county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place in said county to another place therein and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. There is no merit whatever in this appeal. The plaintiff in error was charged jointly with others of conveying 2880 pints of beer from the Keystone Perry, in Osage county, to Jack Harlow’s farm in the southeastern portion of said county. There is no question about his guilt, and the record contains no errors of law justifying a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE CUEIAM.

John Myers, the plaintiff in error, was convicted at the October, 1913, term of the county court of Osage county on a charge of unlawfully conveying intoxicating liquor from one place in said county to another place therein and his punishment fixed at imprisonment in the county jail for a period of thirty days. There is no merit whatever in this appeal. The plaintiff in error was charged jointly with others of conveying 2880 pints of beer from the Keystone Perry, in Osage county, to Jack Harlow’s farm in the southeastern portion of said county. There is no question about his guilt, and the record contains no errors of law justifying a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

146 P. 1198, 11 Okla. Crim. 700, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.