Myers v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Myers v. State

552 S.W.3d 582

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 27, 2018

DocketWD 80358

StatusPublished

This text of 552 S.W.3d 582 (Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. State, 552 S.W.3d 582 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

*583Sara Myers appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Myers raises five claims on appeal. She argues that the motion court erred in denying her motion for change of judge both as a matter of right and for cause. She then argues that the motion court clearly erred in rejecting her claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to (1) impeach a State's witness with evidence of drug intoxication; (2) submit MAI-CR 3d 310.14 regarding the jury's consideration of prior convictions on witness credibility; and (3) submit MAI-CR 3d 310.28 regarding the defense of entrapment. Because the motion court did not clearly err, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

*583Sara Myers appeals the denial, following an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Myers raises five claims on appeal. She argues that the motion court erred in denying her motion for change of judge both as a matter of right and for cause. She then argues that the motion court clearly erred in rejecting her claims that trial counsel was ineffective in failing to (1) impeach a State's witness with evidence of drug intoxication; (2) submit MAI-CR 3d 310.14 regarding the jury's consideration of prior convictions on witness credibility; and (3) submit MAI-CR 3d 310.28 regarding the defense of entrapment. Because the motion court did not clearly err, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.3d 582, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-state-moctapp-2018.