Myers v. State

309 S.W.3d 345, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 214, 2010 WL 623591
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 23, 2010·No. ED 92779·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

George Myers (Movant) appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Perry County denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. Movant asserts that the motion court clearly erred in denying, without an evidentiary hearing, his claims of ineffective assistance of trial and appellate counsel and his claim that newly discovered evidence would have established his actual innocence. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court’s decision was not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. State, 309 S.W.3d 345, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 214, 2010 WL 623591 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

309 S.W.3d 345 (Myers v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Snelling v. Williams
309 S.W.3d 345 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)