Myers v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Myers v. State

264 So. 3d 1150

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedFebruary 27, 2019

DocketNo. 1D18-3045

StatusPublished

This text of 264 So. 3d 1150 (Myers v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. State, 264 So. 3d 1150 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error in the order of revocation. The order of revocation erroneously states Appellant violated special condition 1 of the order of probation. Appellant was found not guilty of this allegation.

*1151AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

In this appeal pursuant to Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the revocation of Appellant's probation and the resulting judgment and sentence. However, we remand for the trial court to correct a scrivener's error in the order of revocation. The order of revocation erroneously states Appellant violated special condition 1 of the order of probation. Appellant was found not guilty of this allegation.

*1151AFFIRMED and REMANDED for entry of a corrected order.

Rowe, Bilbrey, and Kelsey, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 So. 3d 1150, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-state-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack