Myers v. Segars

Supreme Court of Alabama

Myers v. Segars

41 Ala. 383

DecidedJune 15, 1867

StatusPublished

This text of 41 Ala. 383 (Myers v. Segars) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Segars, 41 Ala. 383 (Ala. 1867).

Pincite

Opinion

BYRD, J.

1. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the clerk has not certified that any surety for costs of the appeal was given, or that any appeal was taken. The appellee having joined in the assignments of error, the motion must be overruled, under the authority of Thompson v. Lee, 28 Ala. 453.

2. The appellee also moves to strike the bill of exceptions from the record, on the ground that it does not appear to have been signed by the judge of probate in term time. We think that it sufficiently appears that the bill of exceptions was signed during the term at which the cause was tried ; and the motion must be denied.

3. The bill of exceptions states, that “ the entire record of the court was in evidence”; but it is not set out in this transcript. In this state of the record, we cannot say that the court erred in the decree rendered.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BYRD, J.

1. The appellee moves to dismiss the appeal, on the ground that the clerk has not certified that any surety for costs of the appeal was given, or that any appeal was taken. The appellee having joined in the assignments of error, the motion must be overruled, under the authority of Thompson v. Lee, 28 Ala. 453.

2. The appellee also moves to strike the bill of exceptions from the record, on the ground that it does not appear to have been signed by the judge of probate in term time. We think that it sufficiently appears that the bill of exceptions was signed during the term at which the cause was tried ; and the motion must be denied.

3. The bill of exceptions states, that “ the entire record of the court was in evidence”; but it is not set out in this transcript. In this state of the record, we cannot say that the court erred in the decree rendered.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

41 Ala. 383, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-segars-ala-1867.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack