Myers v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.

Ohio Supreme Court

Myers v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.

2001 Ohio 64, 91 Ohio St. 3d 333

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedApril 11, 2001

Docket2000-0597, 2000-0641

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 2001 Ohio 64 (Myers v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2001 Ohio 64, 91 Ohio St. 3d 333 (Ohio 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 333.]

MYERS ET AL., APPELLEES, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, APPELLANT. [Cite as Myers v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2001-Ohio-64.] Insurance—Homeowner’s insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.— Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (Nos. 00-597 and 00-641—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided April 11, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No. 99CA00083. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 00-597 is reversed on the authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 262, ___ N.E.2d ___. {¶ 2} The certification of conflict in case No. 00-641 is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott Co., L.P.A., and Paul O. Scott, for appellees. John C. Nemeth & Associates and John C. Nemeth, for appellant. __________________

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[This decision has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 91 Ohio St.3d 333.]

MYERS ET AL., APPELLEES, v. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA, APPELLANT. [Cite as Myers v. Safeco Ins. Co. of Am., 2001-Ohio-64.] Insurance—Homeowner’s insurance policy that provides limited liability coverage for vehicles not subject to motor vehicle registration is not a motor vehicle liability policy and is not subject to the requirement of former R.C. 3937.18 to offer uninsured and underinsured motorist coverage—Court of appeals’ judgment reversed on authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co.— Certification of conflict dismissed as improvidently certified. (Nos. 00-597 and 00-641—Submitted March 28, 2001—Decided April 11, 2001.) APPEAL from and CERTIFIED by the Court of Appeals for Licking County, No. 99CA00083. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals in case No. 00-597 is reversed on the authority of Davidson v. Motorists Mut. Ins. Co. (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 262, ___ N.E.2d ___. {¶ 2} The certification of conflict in case No. 00-641 is dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently certified. MOYER, C.J., RESNICK, F.E. SWEENEY, PFEIFER, COOK and LUNDBERG STRATTON, JJ., concur. DOUGLAS, J., dissents. __________________ Clark, Perdue, Roberts & Scott Co., L.P.A., and Paul O. Scott, for appellees. John C. Nemeth & Associates and John C. Nemeth, for appellant. __________________

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

2001 Ohio 64, 91 Ohio St. 3d 333, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-safeco-ins-co-of-am-ohio-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack