Myers v. Rude
This text of 299 P. 50 (Myers v. Rude) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
delivered the opinion of the court.
This cause has been brought to this court by Charles B. Myers. It is a companion case to Myers v. Beck, 88 *460 Colo. 457, 299 Pac. 50, Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., 88 Colo. 461, 299 Pac. 19, and Geo. N. Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., 88 Colo. 523, 299 Pac. 41, all of which have been consecutively prosecuted by separate writs of error, to review various orders and decrees contained in one suit in the district court of Adams county, numbered and entitled, “No. 2367, Charles B. Myers, plaintiff, v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co. et al, defendants.” We have consolidated the several cases for final determination.
The defendants in error under the present writ are Colorado Pulp and Paper Company, George W. Beck as receiver thereof, Intermountain Paper Stock Company, I. Rude, Max Bronstine, Aaron Bronstein, Joseph Buchhalter, Moses Buchhalter, Morris H. Block, Maurice H. Levy, Edward I. Levy, Harry C. Davis, Harry S. Silverstein, Wilbur F. Denious, Stanley T. Wallbank and International Trust Company.
For the reasons given in Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., and Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., supra, the judgment herein is reversed at the costs of plaintiff in error.
For reasons also there stated, we have directed that the costs in Rossi v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., and Geo. N. Sparling Coal Co. v. Colorado Pulp and Paper Co., supra, be assessed to Joseph Buchhalter, I. Rude, Aaron Bronstein and Max Bronstine, who are defendants in error in all of the cases named except Myers v. Beck, supra.
Mr. Justice Butler not participating.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
299 P. 50, 88 Colo. 459, 1931 Colo. LEXIS 224, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-rude-colo-1931.