Myers v. Reading Co.

Third Circuit

Myers v. Reading Co.

155 F.2d 523, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit

DecidedMay 29, 1946

DocketNo. 9102

StatusPublished

This text of 155 F.2d 523 (Myers v. Reading Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Reading Co., 155 F.2d 523, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237 (3d Cir. 1946).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this case the District Judge set aside a verdict of a jury and entered judgment for the defendant. The general verdict was accompanied by special interrogatories the answers to which disposed of the main theory of the plaintiff’s case. The District Court concluded that the plaintiff, as a matter of law, had failed to make out a case under the statute. We agree with that conclusion.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

In this case the District Judge set aside a verdict of a jury and entered judgment for the defendant. The general verdict was accompanied by special interrogatories the answers to which disposed of the main theory of the plaintiff’s case. The District Court concluded that the plaintiff, as a matter of law, had failed to make out a case under the statute. We agree with that conclusion.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

155 F.2d 523, 1946 U.S. App. LEXIS 2237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-reading-co-ca3-1946.