Myers v. O'Brien

Fourth Circuit

Myers v. O'Brien

671 F. App'x 195

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 19, 2016·No. No. 16-6858·Published

Opinion

[196] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Spencer T, Myers, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Myers v. O’Brien, No. 5:14-cv-00162-FPS-MJA (N.D.W. Va. May 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[196] Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Spencer T, Myers, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Myers v. O’Brien, No. 5:14-cv-00162-FPS-MJA (N.D.W. Va. May 26, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Myers v. O'Brien, 671 F. App'x 195 (4th Cir. 2016).

Pincite

671 F. App'x 195 (Myers v. O'Brien) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related