Myers v. Nationwide Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Myers v. Nationwide Insurance

715 A.2d 429

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedAugust 20, 1998

DocketPetition No. 105 E.D. Allocatur Docket 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 715 A.2d 429 (Myers v. Nationwide Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Nationwide Insurance, 715 A.2d 429 (Pa. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 1998 we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal limited to the following issue:

DID THE SUPERIOR COURT ERR IN HOLDING THAT PETITIONER HAD TO SHOW THAT HER AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT WAS A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN CAUSING THE INJURY THAT NECESSITATED HER LATEST SURGERY, FOR WHICH FIRST PARTY MEDICAL BENEFITS WERE DENIED, OR WAS DEMONSTRATION OF A CAUSAL CONNECTION SUFFICIENT?

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

AND NOW, this 20th day of August, 1998 we GRANT the Petition for Allowance of Appeal limited to the following issue:

DID THE SUPERIOR COURT ERR IN HOLDING THAT PETITIONER HAD TO SHOW THAT HER AUTOMOBILE ACCIDENT WAS A SUBSTANTIAL FACTOR IN CAUSING THE INJURY THAT NECESSITATED HER LATEST SURGERY, FOR WHICH FIRST PARTY MEDICAL BENEFITS WERE DENIED, OR WAS DEMONSTRATION OF A CAUSAL CONNECTION SUFFICIENT?

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

715 A.2d 429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-nationwide-insurance-pa-1998.