Myers v. Myers

301 S.E.2d 522, 61 N.C. App. 748, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2738
Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided April 19, 1983·No. 825DC181·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*749 VAUGHN, Chief Judge.

Plaintiff filed this action for absolute divorce on 8 October 1981. Plaintiff also sought distribution of marital property under G.S. 50-20.

Defendant answered and, among other things, sought to have the action dismissed because of the pendency of a prior action filed by him on 15 July 1981 in the District Court of Onslow County. The prior action is said to involve substantially the same parties, subject matter, issues and relief sought so that a judgment in the first action would support a plea of res judicata in the present action.

The judge denied defendant’s “plea in abatement” and motion to dismiss. He also set out certain conclusions of law going to the merits of the defense alleged.

The appeal is from an interlocutory order and must, therefore, be dismissed. The merits of the conclusions of law set out in the order are, of course, not before us.

Appeal dismissed.

Judges Wells and Braswell concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Myers v. Myers, 301 S.E.2d 522, 61 N.C. App. 748, 1983 N.C. App. LEXIS 2738 (N.C. Ct. App. 1983).

301 S.E.2d 522 (Myers v. Myers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Naddeo v. Allstate Insurance
533 S.E.2d 501 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2000)