Myers v. Montgomery

130 N.Y.S. 133

This text of 130 N.Y.S. 133 (Myers v. Montgomery) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Montgomery, 130 N.Y.S. 133 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1911).

Opinion

BIJUR, J.

This action was brought to recover under a contract certain commissions for having secured employment for the defendants. It was shown that the plaintiff corporation had been dissolved prior to the bringing of the action. Thereupon the court rendered the decision:

“Corporation plaintiff dissolved; right of action abated.”

The corporation, however, was dissolved voluntarily, pursuant to the provisions of section 221 of the corporation law. Subdivision 3 of that section provides expressly:

“Said corporation shall, nevertheless, continue in existence for the purpose of * * * and may sue and be sued for the purpose of enforcing such debts or obligations until its business affairs are fully adjusted and wound up.”

See, also, Cunningham v. Glauber, 133 App. Div. 10, 117 N. Y. Supp. 866.

Judgment reversed, and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide the event. All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cunningham v. Glauber
133 A.D. 10 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1909)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
130 N.Y.S. 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-montgomery-nyappterm-1911.