Myers v. Maas
997 So. 2d 1230, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 36
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 31, 2008·No. 2D07-892·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Jay Alan MYERS, Appellant,
v.
Sherrie MAAS, Appellee.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Jay Alan Myers, pro se.
No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Jay Alan Myers failed to timely respond to an order by the circuit court, and as warned in the court's order, his case was dismissed. In response to the dismissal, Myers filed a letter and response that is properly characterized as a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. Myers must pursue relief in the circuit court under rule 1.540.
Affirmed.
NORTHCUTT, C.J., and FULMER and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Myers v. Maas, 997 So. 2d 1230, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 36 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).
997 So. 2d 1230 (Myers v. Maas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoffman v. State
997 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)