Myers v. Maas

997 So. 2d 1230, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 36
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedDecember 31, 2008
Docket2D07-892
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 997 So. 2d 1230 (Myers v. Maas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Myers v. Maas, 997 So. 2d 1230, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 36 (Fla. Ct. App. 2008).

Opinion

997 So.2d 1230 (2008)

Jay Alan MYERS, Appellant,
v.
Sherrie MAAS, Appellee.

No. 2D07-892.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

December 31, 2008.

Jay Alan Myers, pro se.

No appearance for Appellee.

PER CURIAM.

Jay Alan Myers failed to timely respond to an order by the circuit court, and as warned in the court's order, his case was dismissed. In response to the dismissal, Myers filed a letter and response that is properly characterized as a motion for relief from judgment under Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540. Myers must pursue relief in the circuit court under rule 1.540.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, C.J., and FULMER and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffman v. State
997 So. 2d 1230 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
997 So. 2d 1230, 34 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. D 36, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-maas-fladistctapp-2008.