Myers v. Fritz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Myers v. Fritz

10 A. 30, 7 Sadler 93, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 732

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedMay 30, 1887

DocketNo. 295,

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 10 A. 30 (Myers v. Fritz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Fritz, 10 A. 30, 7 Sadler 93, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 732 (Pa. 1887).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cukiam::

We do not think any one of the specifications of error is sustained. The evidence of the magnitude of the storms was such that the counsel for the plaintiff concedes that it should have been submitted to the jury. It was submitted, in a clear and fair charge. In the absence of any more specific instructions being prayed for, we see no error in answers to the points, nor in the charge. It was not misleading or inadequate.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cukiam::

We do not think any one of the specifications of error is sustained. The evidence of the magnitude of the storms was such that the counsel for the plaintiff concedes that it should have been submitted to the jury. It was submitted, in a clear and fair charge. In the absence of any more specific instructions being prayed for, we see no error in answers to the points, nor in the charge. It was not misleading or inadequate.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 A. 30, 7 Sadler 93, 1887 Pa. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-fritz-pa-1887.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack