Myers v. Fir Cab Corp.
This text of 476 N.E.2d 321 (Myers v. Fir Cab Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[808]*808OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment denied. We agree with Justice Bentley Kassal (100 AD2d, at p 33) that summary judgment is inappropriate where, as here, competing inferences may reasonably be drawn as to whether defendant’s conduct constituted negligence.
Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Jasen, Meyer, Simons, Kaye and Alexander concur.
Order reversed, with costs, and plaintiffs’ motion for partial summary judgment denied in a memorandum. Question certified answered in the negative.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
476 N.E.2d 321, 64 N.Y.2d 806, 486 N.Y.S.2d 922, 1985 N.Y. LEXIS 17602, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-fir-cab-corp-ny-1985.