Myers v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Myers v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.

88 S.E. 1009, 18 Ga. App. 173, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 201

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedMay 26, 1916

Docket7005

StatusPublished

This text of 88 S.E. 1009 (Myers v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. Douglas Oil & Fertilizer Co., 88 S.E. 1009, 18 Ga. App. 173, 1916 Ga. App. LEXIS 201 (Ga. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Bboxles, J.

1. The defendant’s plea that the fertilizer for which her note was given was bought for her husband, and that she could not be held liable on the note, as it was an assumption of her husband’s debt, presented an issue of fact, which was passed upon by the jury and resolved against her; and there was ample evidence to support their finding upon this issue.

2. The other questions in this ease are controlled by the decision of this court in Newell v. Douglas Oil & Fertiliser Co., ante, 172 (88 S. E. 1009). Under that decision the court did not err in sustaining the demurrer to certain paragraphs of the defendant’s amended answer.

3. The court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI