Myers v. Doherty

Opinion

USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: pn eX RONALD MYERS, DATE FILED: {2} || □□□□ Plaintiff, -against- 21 CIVIL 219 (PAE) JUDGMENT INSPECTOR MARY CHRISTINE DOHERTY, LIEUTENANT SEAN CONRY, DEPUTY INSPECTOR JAMES FRANCIS KOBEL, SERGEANT RICHARD BEARY, and the CITY OF NEW YORK, Defendant. vn ee ee X It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion & Order dated November 30, 2021, defendants’ motion to dismiss the AC's federal claims is granted. That dismissal is with prejudice, as the AC was Myers's second complaint, and he has not identified any factual basis on which these claims may be rehabilitated. See Cuoco v. Moritsugu, 222 F.3d 99, 112 (2d Cir. 2000). The Court has declined to exercise supplemental jurisdictional over its NYCHRL claims. These claims are dismissed without prejudice; accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York December 1, 2021

RUBY J. KRAJICK Clerk of Court BY: Deputy ae