Myers v. County of Middlesex
185 A. 362, 14 N.J. Misc. 372, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 334
Opinion
Plaintiff had judgment against the county of Middlesex for the storage of a snow plow and services rendered in assem[373]*373bling tractors and plows for clearing snow. The case is entirely devoid of any evidence that a contract was made by an authorized agent of the municipal corporation or had ever been ratified by it. Potter v. Borough of Metuchen, 108 N. J. L. 447; 155 Atl. Rep. 369; Ratajczak v. Board of Education of Perth Amboy, 114 N. J. L. 577; 177 Atl. Rep. 880.
The judgment, therefore, must be reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Myers v. County of Middlesex, 185 A. 362, 14 N.J. Misc. 372, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 334 (N.J. 1936).
185 A. 362 (Myers v. County of Middlesex) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Potter v. Borough of Metuchen
155 A. 369 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1931)
Ratajczak v. Board of Education, Perth Amboy
177 A. 880 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1935)