Myers v. County of Middlesex

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Myers v. County of Middlesex

185 A. 362, 14 N.J. Misc. 372, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 334

DecidedJune 4, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 185 A. 362 (Myers v. County of Middlesex) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Myers v. County of Middlesex, 185 A. 362, 14 N.J. Misc. 372, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 334 (N.J. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff had judgment against the county of Middlesex for the storage of a snow plow and services rendered in assem[373]*373bling tractors and plows for clearing snow. The case is entirely devoid of any evidence that a contract was made by an authorized agent of the municipal corporation or had ever been ratified by it. Potter v. Borough of Metuchen, 108 N. J. L. 447; 155 Atl. Rep. 369; Ratajczak v. Board of Education of Perth Amboy, 114 N. J. L. 577; 177 Atl. Rep. 880.

The judgment, therefore, must be reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff had judgment against the county of Middlesex for the storage of a snow plow and services rendered in assem[373]*373bling tractors and plows for clearing snow. The case is entirely devoid of any evidence that a contract was made by an authorized agent of the municipal corporation or had ever been ratified by it. Potter v. Borough of Metuchen, 108 N. J. L. 447; 155 Atl. Rep. 369; Ratajczak v. Board of Education of Perth Amboy, 114 N. J. L. 577; 177 Atl. Rep. 880.

The judgment, therefore, must be reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

185 A. 362, 14 N.J. Misc. 372, 1936 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 334, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/myers-v-county-of-middlesex-nj-1936.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack