Myers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ALVA M.,! Plaintiff, Case No. 3:18-cv-01048-CL
v. ORDER COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, Defendant.
MCSHANE, Judge: Magistrate Judge Mark D. Clarke filed a Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) and the matter is now before this Court on Plaintiff's objections. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). Ireview de novo. United States v. Bernhardt, 840 F.2d 1441, 1445 (9th Cir. 1998). I find no error and conclude the report is correct. Magistrate Judge Clarke’s Findings and Recommendation (ECF No. 23) is adopted in full. The Commissioner’s decision is AFFIRMED.
‘In the interest of privacy, this Order uses only the first name and the initial of the last name of the non- governmental party in this case and any immediate family members of that party. 1 -ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this __10th__ day of October, 2019.
_______/s/ Michael J. McShane ________ Michael McShane United States District Judge
2 –ORDER
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Myers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration (Myers v. Commissioner Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.